Wednesday, September 17, 2008

She Admits it is Murder--the Extermination of the powerless by the powerful... but....

I admire honesty. I seldom hear it from pro-abortion advocates. I especially get nauseated at the "personally opposed, but...." of so many Catholics and Christians that I know (and politicians). They cannot even admit knowing when Life begins. They have had to change terminology to more 'palatable' terminology to disguise what they are really talking about.

Fetus instead of baby.
Mass of cells instead of baby.
Products of conception instead of baby.
"Choice" instead of Abortion.

Some even call the baby a parasite.

Some try to turn it into a religious thing -- "Keep your rosaries off our ovaries".
They tell us that it is a RIGHT of any woman to do whatever she wants with her body... but ..it isn't HER BODY that is being curreted and suctioned, or... killed just before birth by piercing the back of her head with a scissors to suck out her brains with a suction machine (partial birth abortion), and then crushing the skull for easier delivery of a now dead... BABY.

Many don't even want to look at the results of an abortion, because it is too 'gross'. Actually, it is because when they LOOK, the SEE that " IT " was a CHILD.

But the other day I came across a woman who is honest about what really happens.... and though she is the first person I have found that was honest about what is happening... I almost wish I had not read this.

For in listening to the others NOT being honest, I could pretend that many really didn't know what they were doing.... or saying...

But it isn't just in reading the first article that one understands exactly what Paglia is saying... for that, one needs to read her own article in its entirety. Read the original article: Fresh blood for the vampire

Friday September 12, 2008


Shock: Prominent Feminist Admits "Abortion is Murder" but "I Am a Firm Supporter"

By Tim Waggoner

WASHINGTON, September 11, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In an article focusing on newly appointed vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, prominent feminist Camille Paglia admits that, much like Gov. Palin, she also believes abortion involves the murder of an innocent life - but unlike Palin, Paglia says she is a "firm supporter" of abortion.

Paglia's piece, which appears on Salon.com, is the latest indication that "utilitarian" philosophies that no longer recognize the "right to life" as being the most foundational human right are gaining ground in some liberal circles. Under these philosophies even murder can be advocated as long as it protects what is deemed to be an even more important "right" - in Paglia's case the sacrosanct "right to abortion."

Paglia, the University Professor of Humanities and Media Studies at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, is well-known for her non-conformist approach as a lesbian social critic and as a popular journalist and author. Her latest article, "Fresh blood for the vampire", largely addresses the Republican's surge in the polls after choosing Palin as VP-nominee, but also touches on abortion.

"Let's take the issue of abortion rights, of which I am a firm supporter. As an atheist and libertarian, I believe that government must stay completely out of the sphere of personal choice. Every individual has an absolute right to control his or her body," said Paglia, voicing the commonest argument put forward by feminist supporters of abortion.

Unlike her fellow pro-abortion colleagues, however, Paglia continued on to - as she termed it - "face the ethical consequences" of embracing abortion. "I have always frankly admitted that abortion is murder, the extermination of the powerless by the powerful," she said.

Paglia then admitted that in order to rationalize and accept abortion, one would have to not only accept, but logically condone other atrocities against life - that is, one would have to accept murder for the sake of protecting a particular, more important "right", as she does. The author criticizes those on the social left who parrot the scientifically untenable position that the fetus is just a "lump of tissue", saying that those who do so are simply afraid to face the consequences of their pro-abortion position.

"Liberals for the most part have shrunk from facing the ethical consequences of their embrace of abortion, which results in the annihilation of concrete individuals and not just clumps of insensate tissue," explained Paglia. "The gigantic, instantaneous coast-to-coast rage directed at Sarah Palin when she was identified as pro-life was, I submit, a psychological response by loyal liberals who on some level do not want to open themselves to deep questioning about abortion and its human consequences."

Paglia also criticized some on the social left for their logical inconsistency in condoning the killing of the innocent, but not of the guilty. "I have never understood the standard Democratic combo of support for abortion and yet opposition to the death penalty. Surely it is the guilty rather than the innocent who deserve execution?" she said.

"What I am getting at here is that not until the Democratic Party stringently reexamines its own implicit assumptions and rhetorical formulas will it be able to deal effectively with the enduring and now escalating challenge from the pro-life right wing."

Paglia's professed willingness to sanction murder in order to protect a woman's "right to choose" is comparable to the argument put forward in a recent article published in the highly respected New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The authors of the article, writing on the notion of "brain death" and organ donation, note that the frequently used criteria of death known as "brain death" is inadequate for determining if a potential organ donor has truly died. However, instead of calling into question the idea of vital organ donation, the authors of the piece instead suggest that the criteria for dead donors should be eradicated altogether - thus sanctioning killing a potential organ donor in order to harvest his/her organs.

Likewise, at the beginning of 2008, in a lengthy report that appeared in The Hastings Center Report - called by conservative bioethicist Wesley Smith the "world's most prestigious" journal of bioethics - the authors advocate infanticide for those new born babies who may face a life of what medical personnel deem to be "unbearable" suffering. Under what is known as the Groningen Protocol, infanticide is already taking place on a regular basis in the Netherlands with government support.

###

Lord, Have Mercy.

Christ, Have Mercy.

Lord, Have Mercy.



2 Comments:

Blogger Bevy said...

Very good posts exposing the lefts inability to understand that a child (baby) has rights! Too bad she can't come to a different decision.
You know Palin is pro-choice and that's what bugs the left to NO END - she CHOSE to HAVE her child and so did Bristol! God bless you and them.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 2:13:00 AM CDT  
Blogger WICatholic said...

That is exactly why they cannot stand her, Bevy. She 'dared' to bring Trig into the world--a child with Down's Syndrome? And they didn't race to hide Bristol's pregnancy by aborting that Baby. (Nor did Bristol decide to do so on her own without parental consent!)

Many just do not understand feminism that does not include hatred for our most vulnerable, or hatred of the male population in general.

God bless, Bevy!

Wednesday, September 17, 2008 at 12:52:00 PM CDT  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home