Liberal Thinking on Legal Precedent... Selective!

Mary of Freedom Eden has a very provocative question about legal precedent and the liberal political views of how entrenched it is... until it involves something that they do not endorse or agree with, such as marriage being between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN! Good reading, good points!

God bless~

My question:

Why do liberals expect the courts to aid in advancing certain aspects of their agenda, by ignoring precedence in some cases, while simultaneously using precedence to insist on upholding other decisions?

That sort of selective reliance on precedence is completely inconsistent and clearly politically motivated.