More musings...

My mind often brings in other things as I am reading.

Today, the quote below from an email from Phil Lawler of CWNews had a section that was discussing this article, and when I got to this part, it did just that....

Even if one cardinal did supply the information, we already know that he is dishonest, since he violated a solemn vow; so how could we trust his account? And of course, to complicate matters, the honest cardinals who do maintain their vows of secrecy will not comment, one way or another, to confirm or deny the accuracy of this account.

As I read them, I saw the words they sort of made an instant leap to this....

Even if the abandoning spouse DID supply the information (for the divorce or the petition for nullity), we already know that he/she is dishonest, since he/she violated a solemn vow; so how can we trust his/her account? And of course, to complicate matters, the FAITHFUL spouses left behind by no fault forced unilateral divorce who DO maintain their vows of marriage....

Told you, that is why this place is called 'musings'.....